The program often recommends excluding from the

Collaborate on cutting-edge hong kong data technologies and solutions.
Post Reply
nusaibatara
Posts: 177
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:27 am

The program often recommends excluding from the

Post by nusaibatara »

These are writers such as Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Gogol. What did GlaVred show after the analysis? The final result is within "8" points. This is beyond the minimum "7" points, but still not "10". But these are fiction, not informational texts. Let me remind you that the service is positioned as a tool for bringing texts to an informational style. For another test, conducted by enthusiasts, articles from popular news agencies were used. The result is higher, not higher than "9" points. They also did not reach "10" points, although they have a staff of wonderful editors.



In an interview, Maxim Ilyakhov france phone number list said that he does not require 10 points out of 10 from students. A score of 7 points is enough to pass the test. The following are also considered negative aspects of the service: The service was created by one Maxim Ilyakhov, and this speaks to the subjectivity of the judgments of one person. text the necessary words that are included in expressions as keywords or in phrases. The service does not take into account the semantic relationship between sentences.



If optimizing the text for search engines is important when writing, then in this case you shouldn’t count on GlaVred. glenn-carstens-peters-npxXWgQ33ZQ-unsplash.jpg Conclusion From the above, we can conclude the following. This service should be used only for informational texts. When following the recommendations, do not chase the coveted "10" points, otherwise the text risks becoming boring, bland and uninteresting. In our work, we use GlavRed as an additional, auxiliary tool, but not the main one. When using the service, you need to take into account the shortcomings and carefully analyze the service's recommendations, sometimes ignoring them.
Post Reply