Something that is simple in relation to active ownership

[mahbubamim077]

All over the world, one of the methods used for such verification is income tax returns. These include – or should include – income, assets, obligations (loans), etc. Another method that the Judiciary makes available to litigants elsewhere is bank account and credit card statements. However, there is still resistance among us to granting access to such information, in an extreme attachment to individual economic and financial privacy, which is only possible by disregarding the voluntary communion to which the parties gave themselves, who, remember, could have resorted to legal mechanisms for the separation of assets.

There are regular mechanisms to ensure that what is mine is buy bulk sms france mine and what is yours is yours and, ultimately, we only combine bodies and feelings. Thus, those who have agreed to form a common patrimony through marriage or stable union accept the corresponding economic and financial communion, even within the limits of the regime, as in the case of partial communion of assets.

This overprotection of either party is a stance that allows the Judiciary itself to be taken for a ride . It is worth remembering that, in the cases Sharland v. Sharland and Gohil v. Gohil, decided by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in 2015, the judges drew attention to the fact that it was not only the opposing party that was being deceived, but also the Court itself, leading it to issue a decision that was not correct: if the party had acted in accordance with its duty of procedural loyalty, the decision would have been different.