Page 1 of 1

But what is the reason for this misunderstanding?

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 3:09 am
by mstakh.i.mom.i
I may have just caught you. If a company claims to be agile, this leads to reactions such as dismissal or malicious laughter. Of course, I deliberately provoked this with my statement. In fact, the term agility is often equated with lack of planning and chaos. Agility, on the other hand, is defined as the ability of a company to adapt to changing market conditions in real time and to respond to them professionally using certain "agile methods".

I mean: Through incorrect application of the term agility. This term is security and commodity brokers email list often used incorrectly as a justification after failures, such as: "After all, we were agile here." However, this does not properly reflect the concept of agility. Here, the agile methods were not applied correctly beforehand, but only used as an excuse afterwards. Overall, this has led to the term agility being associated with these excuses rather than with the actual concept.

It's not just about being flexible. Quite the opposite: if the so-called agile methods are used correctly, there is no room for lack of planning and helplessness. This is achieved through crystal-clear deadlines and rules. Only within this framework can simple adherence to old methods be overcome. This allows exciting and spontaneous results to be achieved that would not have been possible without this planned agility.