A vocational school student asks
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2025 5:20 am
The following supposed conversation in a civics lesson would be entirely conceivable after the postal scandal. the teacher: "Is it true that the head of the postal service cheated?" The civics teacher tries to explain to the student that people should not be pilloried too quickly. He answers: "The postal service may have cheated, but whether the head usa rcs data of the postal service has to take responsibility for this will be clarified first. For now, the presumption of innocence applies."
The student counters with another question: "But isn't the boss ultimately responsible for the company?" The teacher agrees with the student and in his answer justifies the high salary and bonus with the great responsibility of the post office boss.
With two questions, the vocational school student outlines two scenarios that could be conceivable in the event of a guilty verdict: "If the boss is guilty, shouldn't she be fired? Couldn't her high salary at least be reduced?" The civics teacher then tries to shift the conversation to the factual level: "It looks like only the bonus will be cut. In any case, the chairman of the board of directors is fully behind the post office boss."
Now the student tries to explain the problem using an analogy to school, before asking a question and introducing the penalty proposal: "If we work well at school, we get a bonus in the form of a good grade. If we work badly, we get a bad grade. That is our penalty. Why couldn't the post office manager also be given a penalty for unsatisfactory performance?" Annoyed by the questions, the civics teacher gives an ill-considered answer: "That would be new in Switzerland. Managers and banks get a bonus even if they get bad results. At the post office, you can't just make an exception."
The student counters with another question: "But isn't the boss ultimately responsible for the company?" The teacher agrees with the student and in his answer justifies the high salary and bonus with the great responsibility of the post office boss.
With two questions, the vocational school student outlines two scenarios that could be conceivable in the event of a guilty verdict: "If the boss is guilty, shouldn't she be fired? Couldn't her high salary at least be reduced?" The civics teacher then tries to shift the conversation to the factual level: "It looks like only the bonus will be cut. In any case, the chairman of the board of directors is fully behind the post office boss."
Now the student tries to explain the problem using an analogy to school, before asking a question and introducing the penalty proposal: "If we work well at school, we get a bonus in the form of a good grade. If we work badly, we get a bad grade. That is our penalty. Why couldn't the post office manager also be given a penalty for unsatisfactory performance?" Annoyed by the questions, the civics teacher gives an ill-considered answer: "That would be new in Switzerland. Managers and banks get a bonus even if they get bad results. At the post office, you can't just make an exception."