Page 1 of 1

Quality media – who defines the quality?

Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 5:09 am
by asimd23
The answer to the "why" is obvious. After all, which member of parliament wants to mess things up with the monopoly media in their own constituency? So it's better to close your eyes and get on with it, because elections are coming up soon...

But somehow you can sense that canada rcs data everyone involved is not entirely comfortable with this "deal for their own good", which is why they are desperately looking for legitimacy. This is probably why the media subsidy monster was fed with additional bureaucratic effort at the meeting of the National Council's Committee for Transport and Telecommunications (the author himself was a member of the KVF for seven years): reports, additional loops, expert panels, clarifications ad infinitum ( persoenlich.com reported ). Apart from further squandering of taxpayers' money, nothing is achieved. The sale of freedom of expression and media diversity remains a political sin.


In the tension between monopoly and cartel structures on the one hand and the demands of a free media order on the other, the term "quality" takes on a special, if contradictory, meaning. While the advertising industry, for example, measures quality using precisely determined ratings, education politicians rely on pedagogical and didactic units of measurement and sports fans associate quality with the number of live broadcasts of their favorite sport. Moreover, quality obviously means something completely different to a 16-year-old school leaver than it does to a 70-year-old pensioner.