It's a good way to develop from ITBP to CIO, just like the "shadow IT" is mentioned, where there is work, there is IT.If you go to UFIDA or other Party B to be a product manager for production, you will really not be satisfied. Characteristics of Party B I said, since we have finished the conversation today, I will also tell you what the gains and losses will be if you go to UF. . When product managers go to Party B, they are always in the business department, not the functional department. The main business of Party B is the development and sales of digital systems, and the company is product-oriented.
Within the business department, the voice is generally canada email list not very weak, at least on an equal footing with R&D, pre-sales and delivery. . Party B is suitable for improving product expertise. If you want to improve the planning, architecture and design capabilities of digital products, Party B is very suitable. Because when Party B considers production, it needs to abstract the needs of several customers or even different industries into the general needs of the product for production. This cannot be learned from Party A. From the perspective of Party B, Party A's projects are all projects.
Therefore, if you want to improve the architecture design capabilities and require digital product abstraction capabilities, Party B is more suitable, and Party B also has such a cultural atmosphere. . If you want to go deep into the company's business, Party B cannot provide it. From the perspective of the future goal of being a CIO, Party A would be more suitable. Even in Party B, those who have worked as business solution experts always think and solve problems from the perspective of digital systems. In Party A, product managers have the opportunity to go deep into the business in all aspects of the view of digitalization from a business perspective.