N published an article about how they

[relemedf5w023]

- Well, write it, it will definitely be a sensation! We need a sensation! The circulation is falling! Write!

Two days later, the newspaper doubted the veracity of the recording. And it was also unclear who had given permission to listen in.

And the media began to go into hysteria. On the one hand, there were unfounded claims that the conversation took place and that the recording was genuine, on the other hand, that the recording was fake. An expert assessment would need to be done, but who would do it? Representatives of the president or representatives of the prosecutor's office? And sri lanka whatsapp data importantly, who would undertake to assert the impartiality of the assessment? Trusting such an assessment to representatives of international bodies would mean making a fool of oneself.

The disputes continued for a long time. In the end, a representative commission was assembled, which included both parties.

Imagine their surprise when, after a month of work, the commission declared that there was a 60% chance that the recording was a fake. After all, voice forgery technology has become widespread on the Blue Planet. All that was needed to forge a recording was a 5-minute video of the victim's voice, which was then used as a sample for imitation. Proving that it was not a fake would be long and expensive.

But who benefited from this press hype?

The media won. After all, circulation increased threefold. Gradually, the scandal was forgotten. And smart people, afraid for their honor and dignity, began to use encryption even in everyday life.

And most importantly, I hope people have thought about the fact that the choice is essentially small. Either encryption of traffic and voice conversations, or loss of honor and dignity, and perhaps even prison.

The only downside for everyone was that the encoders, alas, were not cheap. But security is not cheap, right?