Why doesn't this (kind of) work?

[kexej28769@nongnue]

But if you want to eliminate high-ranking pages, this type of investment is often easier and more productive.

Dino Tactic #5: Obsessing over keyword placement in specific tags/areas
Okay, number five. Last but not least, the obsession with placing keywords in specific tags and specific areas. For example, spending a lot of time and energy making sure that the H1 and H2, headline tags can contain keywords, making sure that the URL has the keywords in exactly the form you want with hyphens, repeating a certain amount of text in the content, making sure that headlines and titles are arranged in specific ways.


It's not that it doesn't work. It's definitely a bare taiwan number data . We have to use our keyword in the title. We definitely want it in the headline. If it's not in the H1 tag, I think we can live with that. I think that's perfectly fine. Instead, I would urge you to move some of the same obsession you have with perfecting those tags, getting that last 0.01% of value out of them into relevant keywords and relevant titles, making sure the physical content uses and uses the topics, titles, words, and phrases that Google knows searchers associate with a given title.

My favorite example of this is if you're trying to rank for "New York neighborhoods" and you have a page that doesn't include the word Brooklyn or Manhattan or Bronx or Queens or Staten Island, your chances of ranking are much, much worse, and you can target all the links and perfect keywords in your H1, but if you can't use all of those things as Google's neighborhood topic, along with the searcher's query, you're probably not going to rank.