Relative Contribution of Each Factor to Explaining Londoners’ Wellbeing
Four of these factors had particularly strong influences on Londoners’ wellbeing (see the dark green highlight in Figure 2). Taken together, these factors were able to account for almost 75% of the total variation in wellbeing outcomes explained by our regression model. Many other things matter, but our evidence suggests that these are middle east rcs data particularly strong determinants of Londoners’ wellbeing which we believe must be considered when thinking about how we can design and enact policies that will improve outcomes across the city.
Employment status, workplace autonomy and wellbeing in London
Londoners who are employed in jobs with high levels of workplace autonomy have significantly better wellbeing outcomes than those who are employed in jobs with low levels of workplace autonomy and those who are in the ‘other’ employment category (not in employment but not retired).
Satisfaction with leisure time and wellbeing in London
Those who are satisfied with their leisure time tend to exhibit higher levels of wellbeing than those who are not, but this pattern does not hold true for everyone. We find no evidence that Londoners who are employed in jobs with low levels of workplace autonomy will have better wellbeing outcomes if they are satisfied with their leisure time, as we do for those with all other kinds of employment statuses.