Anyone who asks around among their own circle of friends will find that bias and one-sidedness are perceived as disturbing. In my opinion, the comment columns in the media are an important communication platform that must not be manipulated. Readers' comments are an important outlet where everyone can let off steam and vent their anger and frustration. Open comments have a positive effect on the readers' mental health. If someone can let off steam in a comment, that is better than if they let their anger build up. Open comments and personal feedback are also an important element from a dialogic point of view. Echoes also allow journalists to see where the public is concerned.
Readers' comments do have disadvantages vietnam rcs data for the editorial team:
- The opinion of the people rarely coincides with the opinion of the editorial team.
- Contributions that are offensive or racist must be eliminated. This causes additional work.
According to media researcher Martin Wettstein, it is important for "20 Minutes" that there are controversial topics to talk about. "Blick" deliberately allows people to share their feelings. It was not so long ago that the NZZ decided that its journalists would select the questions and readers' contributions and deliberately put in hurdles so that not everyone could rate their opinion with a click. When asked about this regrettable intervention (in a Lilienberger interview), NZZ editor-in-chief Eric Gujer could not provide a convincing reason for the new rule.